On the Threshold 
Of World Civilization

World History 
And The Eonic Effect
Civilization, Darwinism, and Theories of Evolution
2nd. Edition
The Book
By  John Landon

Home

 6. Symphony of Emergence  
       6.1 The Eonic Evolution of Civilization 
              6.1.1 World Line of The Eonic Observer
        6.2 Egypt, Sumer and the Rise of Civilization   
               6.2.1 From Akkad to the Assyrians,…and Israel ….     
        6.3 System Cycle, System Return: The ‘Axial’ Transition  
               6.3.1 Age of Revelation or Eonic Transition?  
               6.3.2 Quest for the Historical Gita     
               6.3.3 A Book of Changes  
               6.3.4 Tragedy and the Discrete Freedom Sequence     
       6.4 On the Threshold of World Civilization   
              6.4.1 A Rebirth of Freedom…Cycle, System Return….   
              6.4.2 Anti-Semitism, Mideonic Jackknife, Teleological Tragedy 
Endnotes 
        6.5 Axial Ages and Eonic Observers
        6.6 Religion and Empire 
               6.6.1 Slavery, Abolition, and Eonic Sequence   
               6.6.2 Islams….      

 We have inherited a virtual cornucopia of relevant issues, as our system creates five great oikoumenes, and just as our subject becomes interesting, we bring our eonic account to a rapid close, to do what our system does, in a minimum principle. We can also leapfrog to the rise of the modern world, to make another point. It is appropriate to conclude swiftly, since our mission is accomplished, the demonstration of a non-random pattern, needing only that we touch bases on the rise of the modern once again. We have set up a very useful instrument to proceed seamlessly from our first universal history into our second, and the reader is owed an account of the emergence of the great religions of Christianity and Islam. But it is useful to stick to our eonic mainline, to make a point. Please note that these religions are mideonic constructs, show no eonic determination beyond their sources, and have no special status in world history. The modern Enlightenment promptly shows the response data from the eonic mainline!

The great era of world transformation passes, and by -400 we can see the waning of the effect. The outside date, -200, for Jaspers’ Axial Age is far too late. By then the Athenian world is gone, the Roman Republic is beginning to suffer strains, and era of Empire is soon to come. The great religions are coming into being. We can see the difference in the post-transitional period at once in the passage of the Greek world to the Hellenistic Age. In Greece , the difference is dramatic, visible by the fourth century. Polis is turning into cosmopolis. Indeed it was in this period, as the classicist H. Kitto notes in an essay on the decline of the Greek polis, that the word itself, ‘cosmopolis’, was coined to serve the passage to an allegiance to the greater community of man. A great expenditure of history grew from this point to prepare a first universal cosmopolitanism.[i]

In The Harvest Of Hellenism, F. E. Peters opens his depiction of the great oikoumene that is unfolding by noting, “This is a book about a second generation’, the first generation being that of the Hellenes from Homer to Aristotle, the second one ‘without a name’, Greeks, Macedonians, Romans, Syrians, Jews, Egyptians. They came “under the spell of the Hellenes…condemned or blessed to reap where their spiritual fathers had sown.” [ii]

In fact, Plato and Aristotle are a bit late, but show the last consolidation of our transition, before the rapid waning of the eonic dynamic. The period of the transition from the classical flowering to the Hellenistic world is the most solid, and the most confusing, period where the evidence of historical directionality, and a mysterious misdirection, come together. One aspect of the change is evidenced in the neo-authoritarianism of Plato denounced by Popper and can be found in the minor classic, The Liberal Temper in Greek Politics , by Eric Havelock. The use of the term ‘liberal’ for the Classical Greeks will not work. However, the basic point that Havelock is making is valid, by any terminology, in showing the change of character that came over the Greek world in the generation of Plato. The Sophists are maligned, but they are exemplars of the inchoate transition figures.[iii]

Our eonic model shows us at a glance the psychology of religion that arises in the Christian world, and the compulsion men had to think there were spiritual forces operating on their future, generated from the transition. They were correct, and correctly produced a version of mythological eonic action! We are liable to make the same mistake! It may be no mistake! But it is not the action of divinity. Only secular thought can summon the brusqueness to remind his religious brethren that a divinity would never act according to the hopelessly confused outcomes of monotheism, as the mideonic stream jackknifes and produces Anti-Semitism, and the rival emergent teleological vehicles struggling with medieval inertia.

The world into which the transition passes is one aspect of the perception of cycles that can do harm to progressive advance. As the sociologist Krishan Kumar  notes in Prophecy and Progress,

the backward-looking spell of the memory of the world of classical antiquity remained, to bewitch thinkers into a sense that the great, golden age of man was really in the past, by comparison with which present times were mean and secondhand. This spell was decisively broken only towards the end of the seventeenth century.[iv]