|
|
|
We can restate this as a photo finish argument, falsifying Darwinism. The problem is that
‘history’ and ‘evolution’ overlap, so our account is moving towards a photo
finish contradiction. We are beginning to see something totally different from
what Darwinists propose. Nor is it likely that earlier human emergence could be
something completely different from this. The eonic effect shows us direct examples of the
evolution of social units, religions, cultural entities, at a high level, in a
non-genetic macroevolution. The core nature of man and his culture springs from
the very period Darwinists assume for their account. Are we to suppose without
proof this was purely genetic? The brief photo finish of human evolution since the
beginning of civilization is thus beginning to suggest a surprising set of
facts.
Darwinism fails a reality check, given the eonic effect,
and thus flunks a photo finish test. If someone says the racehorse is one color,
and the photo finish shows another, the original claim comes under suspicion. If
the claim is made that cultural and biological evolution are distinct, we can
construct (below) an evolution of freedom argument demanding an overlap of some
unified homogenous evolution. Over and over people have suspected something is
missing in Darwin’s theory. We sense immediately that we have found it, and in
our own history. The search for a ‘something’ that might ‘cause evolution’
against the random suddenly becomes visible in our own history, seen in the very
pattern of human activity taken over the long term. We see conclusive evidence
of a global aspect to evolution.
|
|