|
|
|
In the evolution of humans the emergence of the
Buddha phenomenon remains one of its most enigmatic aspects, as it appears fully
blown in the Indic stream (and elsewhere, often in disguise). Quite apart from
the sheer inadequacy of Darwinian scientism to even describe this phenomenon,
let alone confront its evolutionary emergence. Our model should not presume to
simplistic explanations, but a close look shows us a number of clues. Although
clearly specialized as an exploration of the limits of philosophy the classical
German phase of philosophy in the Enlightenment shows us in the works of
Schopenhauer how the connection between the discourse of Reason and the sutras
of self-consciousness, as these arise in the phases of Indian Upanishadism, can
easily be made.
The resemblance of Kantian critical thinking to the classic
vein of discourse on ‘appearances’ (Maya) is brought out clearly by that
remarkable successor to Kant, this in parallel to the work of Hegel, despite its
seeming publicity several generations downfield. What is remarkable is that
Schopenhauer appears just at the point that reverse diffusion globally injects
the stream of Indic religious thought into the dramatics of modernism. And yet,
as he insists, his intuitions appear just before the onset of the flood of this
diffusion. He even tells us the secret behind this, as he refers to the One
Thought behind his opus. Although we cannot easily divine the mysteries of mind
in such an Romantic genius, the type par
excellence, we can roughly intuit what he is driving at, and we can also see
that his realization appears almost at one stroke, virtually reinventing ‘buddhism’
on the spot, and in isolation, and this in the most obvious connection to a
general mainline of eonic emergence given powerful expression by a figures such
as Rousseau and Kant.
This is a specialized philosophic endeavor, and may not
reach quite the same result as the practical efforts of ancient yogis and their
meditations and ascetic ractices, but in the end it is all of a piece. It is
this field of eonic emergence that gives us the clue then. And as we look
backward toward the vistas of deep time and the period of man’s earliest
appearances, we can easily suspect, without the details, just how the Buddha
phenomenon could arise suddenly in the deep Paleolithic and almost fully formed
from the latent potential of human self-consciousness.
|
|